Jury Awards $101,000 to Portland Man Who Sued Wells Fargo for Not Fixing Credit Report Due to ID Theft

Serving Portland | Beaverton | Gresham | Lake Oswego

The Oregonian | By Maxine Bernstein | September 03, 2019

An identity thief opened a Wells Fargo car loan account in the name of Matthew Sponer, bought a BMW at a used car dealership in Southern California in July 2016, was caught that fall and convicted several months later.

Despite repeated attempts by Sponer and his lawyer to get his bank to delete the $29,000 debt that his credit report showed he owed for the car loan, Wells Fargo didn’t do it for 14 months. They finally followed through after Sponer sued the bank.

The delay came despite a detective confirming to the bank the identity theft, the thief’s guilty plea and sentencing, the bank’s receipt of a police report and Sponer’s credit card statements that showed he was out of the country when the car was purchased.

On Tuesday, a federal jury awarded Sponer $101,000 in noneconomic damages, finding Wells Fargo Bank negligently and willfully violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act. But the eight-member jury didn’t issue any punitive damages.

Jurors deliberated for about six hours after a four-day federal court trial in Portland.

“A consumer should not have to sue a bank like Wells Fargo to get it to do what the law requires,’’ Sponer’s lawyer, Robert S. Sola, said during his closing argument. “They ignored all the information in their own record.’’

Sponer, a 43-year-old Sellwood resident who does computer work out of his home, was victimized twice, Sola told jurors: once by the ID thief and again by Well Fargo’s “credit irresponsibility.’’

Sponer and his wife cut short a long-planned sailing trip and returned to Oregon, fearing that his bank of 20 years would shut down his credit card, his lawyer said. Sponer had been in New Zealand when police contacted his brother trying to find him to let him know about the ID thief.

Sola urged the jury to send a strong message to the bank’s board of directors with a multimillion-dollar punitive verdict “to get it to stop’’ their corporate misconduct.

He argued that the bank failed to do a reasonable investigation and disregarded at least 10 notices of the alleged fraud, as well as personal letters Sponer wrote to the bank between October 2016 and November 2017.

“He tried over and over and over again, but he couldn’t make them listen,’’ Sola said. “He couldn’t make them do the right thing.’’

It was five weeks after Sponer sued the bank that he finally received notice that his ID theft claim was valid. The car loan account was deleted in January 2018.

Attorney Daniel C. Peterson, representing Wells Fargo, acknowledged for the first time during his closing argument Friday that the bank was negligent in not deleting the car loan account earlier and validating it as a fraud.

He also said the bank made a mistake when a January 2017 letter Sponer sent to Wells Fargo, which contained the police report on the identity theft and a fraud affidavit, was received but never transferred to its fraud department.

The bank’s auto loan credit bureau team handles about 370,000 consumer disputes a year, not only involving identity theft, according to court testimony.

“Mr. Sponer is unquestionably a victim in this case,’’ Peterson told jurors. “Wells Fargo has acknowledged there are things it could have done better.’’

But Peterson blamed human error and argued that no punitive damages were deserved.

Sponer’s frustration and emotional stress resulted from the identity thief and other purchases the thief made in Sponer’s name and not only from the fraudulent loan, the bank’s lawyer argued.

Sponer lawyer shot back in rebuttal, accusing the bank of “courtroom conversion’’ for suddenly admitting its errors at the end of a trial before jury deliberations.

The jury’s verdict showed that Wells Fargo “repeatedly broke the law,” Sola said. “That was our goal, to prove they willfully violated the law and hold them accountable. They gave fair compensation to Mr. Sponer for his damages. ‘’

Peterson said Wells Fargo respects the jury’s decision and appreciates the time and attention it gave.

As for Sponer, he said the ordeal was surreal.

“I never imagined being here,’’ he said.

https://www.oregonlive.com/crime/2019/09/jury-awards-101000-to-portland-man-who-sued-wells-fargo-for-not-fixing-credit-report-due-to-id-theft.html

Do you have questions about your rights as a tenant?

Landlord-Tenant Legal Inquiries

What our clients say
Contact Underdog Law Office Today

Underdog’s Civil Rights Cases in the News

2 students sue PSU, claim university retaliated

The Oregonian, July 3, 2024

Wrongful death lawsuit against Crook County in 2022 shooting allowed to move forward

Central Oregon Daily News, June 5, 2024

2 Portland State students who blocked garage exit file notice to sue school, city

The Oregonian, May 29, 2024

Portland attorney files 8 lawsuits against police actions during protests

KGW 8 News, July 1, 2020

Jury awards $1M to family of suicidal man fatally shot by Portland police in 2021

The Oregonian, May 4, 2024

Portland woman claims security guard from hookah bar and night club assaulted her

The Oregonian, March 31, 2019

Shooting near Mary’s Club sparks $5M lawsuit

KOIN 6 News, August 7, 2022

Google employee says male supervisor sexually harassed him, sues over firing

USA Today, September 27, 2018

Woman awarded $22k in bodily injury lawsuit against Portland

KOIN 6 News, January 19, 2022

Family Of Oregon Woman Who Died In Prison Flu Outbreak Sues for Wrongful Death

Willamette Week, December 10, 2018

Class-action lawsuit filed as homeless sweeps increase

Portland Tribune, May 25, 2021

City of Portland Sued Over Stolen Car Mixup

The Skanner, June 2, 2014

Jury Awards $101,000 to Portland Man Who Sued Wells Fargo for Not Fixing Credit Report Due to ID Theft in Portland, OR

Serving the Portland Metro Area

Portland | Beaverton | Gresham | Lake Oswego

Contact UsRead Our Reviews
Underdog Law Logo
Contact Underdog Law Office

Leave your information below and we’ll be in touch. If this is a matter we can help you with at this time, we’ll let you know right away.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.